Sapientia
Get your free audit Free audit
Customers

Three tests against their own process. Two reports you can read.

No names and no percentages without written permission. What's here is the shape of each test, plus two real audits with the brand redacted.

Get your free audit Read a real report
200+ Amazon sellers served, most of them cross-border brands
2,550 stores connected · seller × marketplace · Aug 2026
23 Amazon marketplaces · NA · EU · FE
Case studies

What each team tested, and what happened.

Every one ran Sapientia next to the process they already had. That is the only comparison a finance team will trust.

Case 1 · Sportswear

Global sportswear brand

~$140M sales40-person Amazon teamUS · EU
Tested Group A on Sapientia, Group B on the existing process. Same period, operators and budgets.
30 days later Group A’s ACOS and TACoS fell further; Group B drifted up. They moved Group B over.
Percentages withheld until the brand approves them.
Case 2 · Office supplies

Office-supplies seller

4,000+ SKUs~$70M salesUS
Tested About 80% of ad activity moved onto recommendations, approved in batches.
30 days later Spend down on terms that never converted, flat on the ones that did. The in-house team kept the account.
Their reason wasn’t a number: nobody had to wonder what the software did overnight.
Case 3 · Boutique brand

Multi-category boutique brand

~$40M salesUS
Tested 100% of ad management on Sapientia during the trial.
30 days later ACOS settled below where it started; TACoS held. They kept the configuration after the trial.
Percentages withheld until the brand approves them.
How "better" gets measured

Every change is reviewed seven days later.

Seven days before against seven days after, plus the sales lost to the move. A ledger, not a feeling.

Review · 7 days after each change
Applied Before After Saved
Negate 17 zero-order terms$412$38$374
Pause scenario campaign · TOS +330%$1,117$0$1,117
Premium ladder step 1 · 200 → 160%$12,140$10,655$1,485
Bid −30% on hook-style terms$126$71$55

Illustrative rows · anonymized · not a guarantee of results

Read a real report

Two audits, redacted, end to end.

A case study is our summary. A report is the product.

Amazon.com · Jul 21 – Aug 19, 2026

Clear shower curtain liner · 13 variants

78
B- · Healthy, structurally bloated 422 campaigns · $410K/mo · 36.6% ACOS
Bottom line Don't cut keywords. Reprice the structure. The keyword book is clean. The money sits in top-of-search premiums on the worst words, and in 317 of 422 campaigns spending 2.2%.
Read the redacted report →
Amazon.it · Jan 27 – Feb 26, 2026

Robot vacuum · 2 models, 5 variants

52
Warning €549–699 products · 16.6% ACOS · 56% of orders from ads
Bottom line Brand defense is excellent. Category attack barely exists. 39% of spend, across 192 search terms, produced zero orders. Two variants were out of stock with ads still running.
See the published sample reports →

Real product output with identifying details removed · projections inside are labeled as such

References

Talk to someone who runs it.

A customer in a category like yours, under NDA. Ask what it found, what it missed, and what they'd do differently.

Request a reference call
Customer logos Shown only with written permission, so this space stays empty until a brand says yes.

Run the same audit on your ASIN.

Free for the first ASIN. About 30 minutes. Nothing changes unless you approve it.

Get your free audit Book a demo